#Oxygen xml editor little green box mac os#
#Oxygen xml editor little green box pdf#

For example, the same manuscript could be easily published to the web, mobile, print, and pdf by manipulating the DITA map. Topics associated with the DITA map can then be reused and published into different outputs. The DITA map gives the topics sequence and structure allowing multiple authors to manipulate project files. A DITA map is a container for topics used to transform content created by multiple authors and arranged by multiple editors into a single publishable output.

The individual pieces are then arranged using a Darwin Information Typing Architecture (DITA) map editor. Oxygen XML Editor allows projects to be broken into individual topics identified as tasks, references, or concepts.

#Oxygen xml editor little green box mac os#

Along with related products Oxygen XML author (a simplified version for content authors) and Oxygen XML Developer (for XML development), Oxygen XML Editor is a cross platform application available on all major operating systems like Windows, Mac OS X, Linux, and Solaris, which makes it ideal for organizations that need to manage large projects with multiple authors or editors who manipulate content that may be used on multiple platforms.

Oxygen XML Editor is one of the many programs that try to solve some of the problems associated with reworking content into XML. Although coding a manuscript from a word processing file into an XML formatted file can be time consuming, it is a useful step because the application used to produce the original version of the manuscript may not be accessible in the future. XML is a markup language that defines a set of rules for encoding documents in a format that is both human- and machine-readable. Tagging a text with an eXtensible Markup Language (XML) has become a necessary part of the publishing process because coding files in XML is a simple way to preserve and repurpose the data in those files. Developers release new versions of familiar programs and replace antiquated tools with new and improved incarnations that often barely resemble their predecessors, and publishers must find a forward-thinking way to preserve their documents without relying on any one program. Advances in computing technology constantly change the capacities of desktop publishing programs. However, we acknowledge and discuss some of the challenges of big data approaches to ecological regression analyses such as this, and outline promising directions and opportunities for future research.Almost thirty years have passed since the explosion of desktop publishing. Taken together, our analyses produce little evidence to support public health policies that restrict citizens from outdoor mobility in blue-green spaces, which corroborates experimental studies showing low risk of outdoor COVID-19 transmission. Ultraviolet radiation stands out as the strongest environmental mitigant of COVID-19 spread, while temperature, humidity, wind speed, and ambient air pollution have little to no effect. By contrast, increases in the total mobility and relaxation of other non-pharmaceutical interventions such as containment and closure policies predict greater transmission. After controlling for a number of environmental factors, we find no evidence that increased visits to blue-green space increase COVID-19 transmission. We then use machine learning forecast models and linear mixed-effects models to explore predictors of COVID-19 growth rates. We measure mobility in blue-green spaces with planetary-scale aggregate and anonymized mobility flows derived from mobile phone tracking data. Our assessment uses a spatially resolved dataset of COVID-19 case numbers for 848 administrative units across 153 countries during the first year of the pandemic (February 2020 to February 2021). We assess whether restrictions on human movement, particularly in blue-green spaces, affected the transmission of COVID-19. Mobility restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic ostensibly prevented the public from transmitting the disease in public places, but they also hampered outdoor recreation, despite the importance of blue-green spaces (e.g., parks and natural areas) for physical and mental health.